Re: warning message in standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: warning message in standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1276529669.23257.52534.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: warning message in standby (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: warning message in standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > >> Should I be downgrading Hot Standby breakages to LOG? That will > >> certainly help high availability as well. > > > > If a message is being issued in a non-user-connected session, there > > is basically not a lot of point in WARNING or below. It should either > > be LOG, or ERROR/FATAL/PANIC (which are probably all about the same > > thing in the startup process...) > > I think Simon's point here is the same as mine - LOG isn't too high - > it's too low. Yes, *and* how do we decide which this is? Should I downgrade all of my code to throwing LOGs rather than ERRORs, because (following the same argument) doing so would be better for high availability? It's not a facetious question. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: