Re: Synchronization levels in SR
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1274959830.6203.4315.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronization levels in SR (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronization levels in SR
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:50 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > For now, I agree that we support a quorum commit feature for 9.1 or later. > But I don't think that it's simpler, more intuitive and easier-to-understand > than per-standby setting. So I think that we should include the per-standby > setting in the first patch. There already is a first patch to the community that implements quorum commit, just not by you. If you have a better way, describe it in detail and in full now, with reference to each of the use cases you mentioned, so that people get a chance to give their opinions on your design. Then we can let the community decide whether or not that second way is actually better. We may not need a second patch. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: