Re: Synchronization levels in SR
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1274882086.6203.3042.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronization levels in SR (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronization levels in SR
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 07:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > OK. In words of one syllable, your way still has all the same knobs, > plus some more. I explained how the per-standby settings would take many parameters, whereas per-transaction settings take far fewer. > You sketched out a design which still had a per-standby setting for > each standby, but IN ADDITION had a setting for a setting to control > quorum commit[1]. No, you misread it. Again. The parameters were not IN ADDITION - obviously so, otherwise I wouldn't claim there were fewer, would I? Your reply has again avoided the subject of how we would handle failure modes with per-standby settings. That is important. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: