Re: Synchronization levels in SR
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1274880046.6203.2989.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronization levels in SR (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronization levels in SR
Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 18:52 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > I guess that dropping the support of #3 doesn't reduce complexity > since the code of #3 is almost the same as that of #2. Like > walreceiver sends the ACK after receiving the WAL in #2 case, it has > only to do the same thing after the WAL flush. Hmm, well the code for #3 is similar also to the code for #4. So if you do #2, its easy to do #2, #3 and #4 together. The comment is about whether having #3 makes sense from a user interface perspective. It's easy to add options, but they must have useful meaning. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: