On fre, 2010-05-21 at 16:31 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> I guess the justification is that with the same argument you could
> argue that a view should have relkind 'r', since it's just an empty
> table with a rewrite rule attached.
It used to be that way, but now a view doesn't have an empty table
attached to it, but no table at all. Hence the different relkind.