Re: Synchronization levels in SR

On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 18:29 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:

> If people agree that the above is our roadmap, implementing
> "per-standby" first makes sense, and then we can implement "per-session"
> GUC later.

IMHO "per-standby" sounds simple, but is dangerously simplistic,
explained on another part of the thread.

We need to think clearly about failure modes and how they will be
handled. Failure modes and edge cases completely govern the design here.
"All running smoothly" isn't a major concern and so it appears that the
user interface can be done various ways.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com