Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1273647057.308.306.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 14:01 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I already explained that killing the startup process first is a bad idea > > for many reasons when shutdown was discussed. Can't remember who added > > the new standby shutdown code recently, but it sounds like their design > > was pretty poor if it didn't include shutting down properly with HS. I > > hope they fix the bug they have introduced. HS was never designed to > > work that way, so there is no flaw there; it certainly worked when > > committed. > > New smart shutdown during recovery doesn't kill the startup process until > all of the read only backends have gone away. So it works fine with HS. Yes, I thought some more about what Robert said. HS works identically to normal running in this regard, so there's no hint of a bug or design flaw on that for either of us to worry about. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: