Re: bool: symbol name collision

On mån, 2010-05-10 at 02:02 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> I don't see any other conflicts offhand that would create problems
> using a c99 compiler to build server modules. It's quite annoying and
> sad that they added "bool" to c99 since otherwise it would just be a
> drop-in replacement with extra functionality and very low risk of
> conflicts. Instead they virtually guaranteed conflicts with any large
> software over a single define.

For that reason they put it into a separate header file stdbool.h that
no one is required to include.