Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1272335722.4161.5971.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 13:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> If you like I'll have a go at rewriting the comments for this patch, > >> because I am currently thinking that the problem is not so much with > >> the code as with the poor explanation of what it's doing. Sometimes > >> the author is too close to the code to understand why other people > >> have a hard time understanding it. > > > That would help me, thank you. > > OK. You said you were currently working some more on the patch, so > I'll wait for v3 and then work on it. v3 attached Changes: * Strange locking in KnownAssignedXidsAdd() moved to RecordKnown... * KnownAssignedXidsAdd() reordered, assert-ish code added * Tail movement during snapshots no longer possible * Tail movement during xid removal added to KnownAssignedXidsSearch() * Major comment hacking Little bit rough, definitely needs a re-read of all comments, so good time to send over. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: