Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2011/11/30 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
>> How about
>> CHECK (parse, names=off) FUNCTION foobar(a, b, c)

> this syntax is relative consistent with EXPLAIN, is it ok for all?

It seems pretty awkward to me, particularly putting the options before
the second keyword of the command --- that could bite us if we ever want
some other flavors of CHECK command.  I prefer Robert's suggestion of a
WITH clause at the end.
        regards, tom lane