On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 17:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I will change the error message.
>
> I gave a good deal of thought to trying to figure out a cleaner
> solution to this problem than just changing the error message and
> failed. So let's change the error message. Of course I'm not quite
> sure what we should change it TO, given that the situation is the
> result of an interaction between three different GUCs and we have no
> way to distinguish which one(s) are the problem.
"You need all three" covers it.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com