Re: Sequence usage patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Sequence usage patch
Дата
Msg-id 12714.1054009269@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Sequence usage patch  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
Ответы Re: Sequence usage patch  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
Re: Sequence usage patch  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
Список pgsql-patches
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
> I don't see PREVIOUS as a reserved word, but CURRENT
> certainly is -- WHERE CURRENT OF for cursors, and several other places.

> The attached patch makes CURRENT a reserved word.

I do not think it will be necessary to treat CURRENT as a fully-reserved
word in order to support WHERE CURRENT OF, and accordingly I'm not very
happy with reserving it in order to support this ungainly,
not-yet-and-possibly-never-standard syntax.  I still think that Oracle's
syntax is nicer, and by any sane estimate it is more of a real-world
standard than an unapproved 2000-something draft.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages