On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 07:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 11:06 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> >> >>>> * Redefine smart shutdown in standby mode?
> >> >>> Drop. Too big a change at this point.
> >> >>
> >> >> We have a working patch for this - I want to commit it. I don't think
> >> >> it's a big change, and the current behavior is extremely pathological.
> >> >
> >> > Oh, ok. I didn't look at the latest patch, if it looks good to you, fine
> >> > with me.
> >>
> >> I'll commit it tonight.
> >
> > I don't see this on hackers. Have you posted it? I'd like to see what
> > you do before it gets committed. Thanks.
>
> It's the same patch Fujii Masao posted previously, for which I
> previously said I would fix up the comments and docs and commit. But
> here is the adjusted version, which is hopefully more clear about what
> we're doing at why we're doing it.
OK, that looks a lot less risky than I had understood from discussions.
The main thing for me is it doesn't interfere with Startup or
WalReceiver, so assuming it works I've got no objections. Thanks for
chasing this down, good addition.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com