Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I do think that it is conceivable that we want to be able to suppress
> the examination of some settings, but I would think that would apply to
> SHOW just the same as SHOW ALL. It seems that anything I can SHOW should
> be there when I do SHOW ALL. Maybe it should be GUC_NO_SHOW and apply to
> both?
Nah, that can be implemented by the show_hook subroutine refusing to
disclose anything. NO_SHOW_ALL is only useful for making SHOW ALL
vary from what SHOW does.
regards, tom lane