Re: More idle thoughts
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: More idle thoughts |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1269793928.3684.2651.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | More idle thoughts (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: More idle thoughts
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 18:59 +0000, Greg Stark wrote: > The Linux kernel had a big push to reduce latency, and one of the > tricks they did was they replaced the usual interrupt points with a > call which noted how long it had been since the last interrupt point. > It occurs to me we could do the same for CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() by > conditionally having it call a function which calls gettimeofday and > compares with the previous timestamp received at the last CFI(). Reducing latency sounds good, but what has CFI got to do with that? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: