Re: Is DBLINK transactional
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is DBLINK transactional |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1268430857.32299.11.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Is DBLINK transactional (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Is DBLINK transactional
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 12:07 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> of course. You can always explicitly open a transaction on the remote
> side over dblink, do work, and commit it at the last possible moment.
> Your transactions aren't perfectly synchronized...if you crash in the
> precise moment between committing the remote and the local you can get
> in trouble. The chances of this are extremely remote though.
If you want a better guarantee than that, consider using 2PC.
The problem with things that are "extremely remote" possibilities are
that they tend to be less remote than we expect ;)
Regards,
Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: