Re: partition pruning
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partition pruning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1268087950.10620.49.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partition pruning (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:40 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com> wrote: > > When I use intervals in my query e.g col1 between current_timestamp - > > interval '10 days' and current_timestamp...the optimizer checks ALL > > partitions whereas if I use col1 between 2 hardcoded dates..only > > the applicable partitions are scanned. > > Yep. This is one example of a more general principle: > constant-folding happens before planning, but anything more complex > has to wait until execution time. So the plan can't take into account > the value of current_timestamp in forming the plan. It could, but it doesn't yet. Partition removal can take place in the executor and this is currently targeted for 9.1. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: