Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
Дата
Msg-id 1268.1256226694@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)  (Denis BUCHER <dbucherml@hsolutions.ch>)
Ответы Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)  (Denis BUCHER <dbucherml@hsolutions.ch>)
Список pgsql-sql
Denis BUCHER <dbucherml@hsolutions.ch> writes:
> To do this it will be a little complicated because of table
> dependencies... And it could bug again at the next DROP COLUMN... Is
> there a way to change my function (RETURN SETOF part) to specify the
> column names/types ?

No, not really.  You could maybe un-drop the columns with some manual
surgery on pg_attribute, but it doesn't seem like that's going to lead
to a nice solution.

If you were really desperate you could try back-porting the patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-08/msg00068.php
but I wouldn't want to vouch for its safety, considering it hasn't
been through a beta test cycle yet.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
Следующее
От: Gary Chambers
Дата:
Сообщение: Assigning Values to Composite Types