Re: default_language

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:30 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> +1 for removing default_do_language, too.

> +1 for removing default_do_language OR adding default_language.

> I prefer a hard-wired default of PLpgSQL, so a missing language
> statement on a DO block is always interpreted the same.

So it seems everyone is okay with the latter?  (Remove
default_do_language in place of a hard-wired default of "plpgsql",
don't change CREATE FUNCTION's behavior.)
        regards, tom lane