Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Дата
Msg-id 1267789829.15738.4.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Список pgsql-bugs
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +0000, Lou Picciano wrote:
> While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh...  make _all_, and that make
> building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive,  an option to
> configure like:
>
> ./configure --no-docs   or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
>
> - with some of the obvious variants - might be very useful.
>  Especially if docs are available elsewhere, and for those of us who
> may not have the inclination to retain/host all docs for all packages
> we build, or may prefer a specific format anyway, and who are really
> looking for the core software in any case...

But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
have the docs available by default, so they can read them.

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?