Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1267208448.20134.1165.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate
"multiple jobs", so partly revert
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Log Message: > > > ----------- > > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the > > > previous patch. > > > > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the > > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring > > a dump makes no mention of this new facility, The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points > nor does the perf tips > > section. Only that one. > > Also says that the option doesn't work with --single-transaction, so we > > should say that you've added in TRUNCATE to make the COPY go faster (or > > haven't you? I know we discussed it). > > Good point. Documentation patch attached and applied. > -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: