Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Дата
Msg-id 12664.1409594984@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Ответы Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers  (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>)
Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
> On 08/30/2014 12:15 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> If we were to go with the hooks as you propose, we would still need
>> to take the information from TriggerData and put it somewhere else
>> for the hook to reference.

> Sure.

FWIW, I agree with Heikki on this point.  It makes a lot more sense for
the parser to provide hooks comparable to the existing hooks for resolving
column refs, and it's not apparent that loading such functionality into
SPI is sane at all.

OTOH, I agree with Kevin that the things we're talking about are
lightweight relations not variables.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch for psql History Display on MacOSX
Следующее
От: Alexey Klyukin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: implement subject alternative names support for SSL connections