Re: Air-traffic benchmark

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Air-traffic benchmark
Дата
Msg-id 1265280073.4660.157.camel@ebony
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Air-traffic benchmark  (Lefteris <lsidir@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:38 +0100, Lefteris wrote:
> Reported query times are (in sec):
> MonetDB 7.9s
> InfoBright 12.13s
> LucidDB 54.8s

It needs to be pointed out that those databases are specifically
optimised for Data Warehousing, whereas Postgres core is optimised for
concurrent write workloads in production systems.

If you want a best-vs-best type of comparison, you should be looking at
a version of Postgres optimised for Data Warehousing. These results show
that Postgres-related options exist that clearly beat the above numbers.
http://community.greenplum.com/showthread.php?t=111
I note also that Greenplum's Single Node Edition is now free to use, so
is a reasonable product for comparison on this list.

Also, I'm unimpressed by a Data Warehouse database that requires
everything to reside in memory, e.g. MonetDB. That severely limits
real-world usability, in my experience because it implies the queries
you're running aren't ad-hoc.

--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amitabh Kant
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Optimizing Postgresql server and FreeBSD for heavy read and writes
Следующее
От: Matthew Wakeling
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Optimizing Postgresql server and FreeBSD for heavy read and writes