Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 16:44 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I removed code that you mentioned was
> > buggy because I don't have time to fix it and it is not high enough up
> > the priority list. We have discussed all of these things before yet you
> > raise them again as if those things have never been said.
> 
> *sigh*. Yeah, we've been through this. As I've said before, I never said
> the code was buggy, that was just a misunderstanding at your end.

OK, if you say I misunderstood, then I accept that. 

The deed is done and the code removed. Putting it back takes time and
given enough of that rare cloth, it will eventually be put back.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com