Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1264754479.24669.15374.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:31 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Hmm, I'm sorry but that's bogus. Retaining so much WAL that we are > > strongly in danger of blowing disk space is not what I would call a > > safety feature. Since there is no way to control or restrain the number > > of files for certain, that approach seems fatally flawed. Reducing > > checkpoint_timeout is the opposite of what you would want to do for > > performance. > > Why do you worry about that only in the standby? I don't. The "safety feature" we just added makes it much more likely that this will happen on standby. > To improve the situation, I think that we need to use > checkpoint_segment/timeout as a trigger of restartpoint, regardless > of the checkpoint record. Though I'm not sure that is possible and > should be included in v9.0. Yes, that is a simple change. I think it is needed now. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: