Re: default_language
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: default_language |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1264409740.13571.48.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: default_language (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: default_language
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:08 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't > > have a parameter called "default_language"? > > According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION > is SQL. Should we implement that? So the SQL Standard supports the concept of a default language? So should we, though giving the user the choice of what the default should be, standard or otherwise. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: