Re: default_language
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: default_language |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1264375080.13571.5.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: default_language (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: default_language
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 17:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > If we have a default (for DO and CREATE FUNCTION), why not hard-wire the > > default to plpgsql? > > I don't see any strong argument for having a default for CREATE > FUNCTION. The original argument for having a GUC for DO was that > plpgsql wasn't built in; now that it is, I think a case could > be made for dropping default_do_language in favor of a hardwired > default. I would prefer having the option, but removing it completely does at least solve the bizarre inconsistency I've highlighted. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: