Re: damage control mode
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: damage control mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1263124343.19367.139498.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: damage control mode (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 08:46 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > it seems much better to me to have the rule than not I think we can overplay the need for lots of rules here and the need to chase up status every 5 minutes. The first problem, in previous years, was patches spent too long on the patch queue. That is now solved, AFAICS, at least to my satisfaction. The second problem was spending >4 months on code consolidation at last commitfest before we go to beta. We are unlikely to avoid that just by saying "it will be two weeks"; trying to force it will cause arguments, waste developer time and possibly endanger code quality. AFAICS we are on track for a much improved situation than before and I'm personally happy with that also. Quality > Completeness > Timeliness, IMHO. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: