Re: libpq naming on Win64

On tis, 2010-01-05 at 16:48 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I would have thought Microsoft would have a better solution than this
> > for managing 64-bit libraries.  Or am I too optimistic about Redmond's
> > competence?
> 
> They have two separate installation directories for 32 and 64 bit
> packages. With PostgreSQL though, we'll quite possibly be shipping
> both 32 and 64 bit components in the same installer, and thus going
> into the same installation directory.

Can't the installer install things into two separate directories?