Re: alpha3 release schedule?
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: alpha3 release schedule? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1261502142.7442.6438.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: alpha3 release schedule? (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: alpha3 release schedule?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 18:40 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > The issue I mentioned had nothing to do with starting from a shutdown > checkpoint - it's still a problem if you keep the standby running > through the restart cycle in the master) - but maybe you thought it was? > Or was there something else? Strangely enough that exact same problem already happens with archive_mode, and we see a fix coming for that soon also. That fix takes the same approach as HS already takes. HS will flip out when it sees the next record (checkpoint). The only way out is to re-take base backup, just the same. Even after that fix is applied, HS will still work as well as archive-mode, so if anything HS is ahead of other functionality. Fixing obscure cases where people actively try to get past configuration options is not a priority. I'm not sure why you see it as important, especially when you've argued we don't even need the parameter in the first place. You've been perfectly happy for *years* with the situation that recovery would fail if max_prepared_transactions was not correctly. You're not going to tell me you never noticed? Why is avoidance of obvious misconfiguration of HS such a heavy priority when nothing else ever was? I'm going to concentrate on fixing important issues. I'd rather you helped with those. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: