Re: WAL Info messages

On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 11:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > I definitely wouldn't presume that anybody using Hot Standby would
> > necessarily want NOTIFY to reach the standby, especially if there was an
> > overhead to doing so. If using NOTIFY is the favoured approach, I would
> > add a separate parameter for it and/or an explicit option on NOTIFY.
> 
> Yeah, I had just come to the same conclusion: you'd want a separate
> spigot handle on sending NOTIFY to WAL, regardless of any general flag
> about HS.

Anybody know the latest on in-memory NOTIFY? 

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com