Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1259962499.1348.9.camel@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I attached updated patch and doc patch. Zdenek Peter Eisentraut píše v so 21. 11. 2009 v 13:19 +0200: > On lör, 2009-11-14 at 14:50 +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut píše v so 14. 11. 2009 v 10:41 +0200: > > > On tor, 2009-09-17 at 21:43 +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > > > Attached patch extends pg_ctl command with init option. > > > > > > > > pg_ctl -D /var/lib/postgres [-s] init > > > > > > > > This should replace usage of initdb command which has problematic name > > > > as we already discussed several times. Initdb binary will be still > > > > there, but it can be renamed and move into execlib dir in the future. > > > > > > > > Patch does not contains documentation changes. They will depends on > > > > decision which database initialization method will be preferred. > > > > > > OK, let's see. The patch is pretty straightforward, but does anyone > > > else actually want this? Comments? > > > > > > > Maybe we could ask on general where is more admins. I will send voting > > email. > > I think this is over now. There was some support, some "don't care, but > could make sense", and no one violently objecting, so please finish the > patch up with documentation, and it can go in as far as I'm concerned. > > Someone was proposing that pg_ctl initdb be an alias to pg_ctl init. > Perhaps you could add that. >
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: