Re: Partitioning option for COPY
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning option for COPY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1259050649.30357.52.camel@hvost1700 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partitioning option for COPY (Emmanuel Cecchet <manu@asterdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning option for COPY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:24 -0500, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote: > But it looks like it is a waste of everybody's time to continue this > discussion further. Just move the patch to the rejected patches and > let's wait for Itagaki's implementation. Emmanuel, please try to work together with Itagaki san on getting the bigger vision implemented, as this is a thing that can benefit a lot from more people who have taken the time to learn about the parts of code involved. Even though this patch will not get in, most of the effort in developing it is not actual coding, but familiarizing yourself with the other code involved. Coding actual patches should be easy once you know the code _and_ the desired result. You probably already know a lot of what is required to help us to common goal of a clean implementation of partitioning. > -- > Emmanuel Cecchet > Aster Data > Web: http://www.asterdata.com > > -- Hannu Krosing http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability Services, Consulting and Training
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: