On mån, 2009-11-16 at 22:37 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2009-10-21 at 13:11 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> > Sure. Client encoding is declared in body of a file, but BOM is
> > in head of the file. So, we should always ignore BOM sequence
> > at the file head no matter what client encoding is used.
> >
> > The attached patch replace BOM with while spaces, but it does not
> > change client encoding automatically. I think we can always ignore
> > client encoding at the replacement because SQL command cannot start
> > with BOM sequence. If we don't ignore the sequence, execution of
> > the script must fail with syntax error.
>
> OK, I think the consensus here is:
>
> - Eat BOM at beginning of file (as you implemented)
>
> - Only when client encoding is UTF-8 --> please fix that
>
> I'm not sure if replacing a BOM by three spaces is a good way to
> implement "eating", because it might throw off a column indicator
> somewhere, say, but I couldn't reproduce a problem. Note that the U
> +FEFF character is defined as *zero-width* non-breaking space.
I have committed a change that implements the above.