Re: Listen / Notify rewrite

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
Дата
Msg-id 1258309958.14054.2323.camel@ebony
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Listen / Notify rewrite  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
Ответы Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 22:25 +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote:

>  3. Every distinct notification is delivered.

> Regarding performance, the slru-queue is not fsync-ed to disk

These two statements seem to be in opposition. How do you know a
notification will be delivered if the queue is non-recoverable? Surely
the idea is to send information externally to the database, so why
should that stream of info be altered depending upon whether the
database crashes? You couldn't use it to reliably update an external
cache for example.

Why do we need this as well as PgQ? For me, I would need a good reason
why this shouldn't be implemented using a normal table, plus bells and
whistles. If normal tables don't do what you need, perhaps that's a
place to add value.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby