Re: operator exclusion constraints

On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 14:36 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I guess my point wasn't that the message was likely to be exercised,
> but rather that it isn't obvious that it's describing an error
> condition at all.  If you get this message:
> 
> relation "whatever" has relopxconstraints = -3
> 

I pretty much copied similar code for relchecks, see
pg_constraint.c:570.

If you have a suggestion, I'll make the change. It doesn't sound too
urgent though, to me.

Regards,Jeff Davis