On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 23:16 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> >> needs significant preparation for them. Announcing an EOL early in time
> >> would give them the required time before the version used disappears.
> >
> > So, should we announce it for June?
>
> No, it should be longer. June is practically around the corner
> as far as business planning is concerned. Make it a year. Since it's
> mid November, why not just say 2011?
If a business wants support they can buy it. There is no reason for this
community to continue supporting it.
>
> > And yes, i'm +1 for having a rule for EOL, like "5 versions are
> > supported".
>
> If we released on a consistent schedule, this *might* be possible.
> But we don't, so we can't say something like this.
>
We can say 5 "years" from release though.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander