Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT
Дата
Msg-id 1256562480.8450.11140.camel@ebony
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Otherwise I'm not sure it matters.

If that were true, why did Red Hat lawyers do this?

ISTM we should apply to OSI for approval of our licence, so we can then
refer to it as the PostgreSQL licence. That then avoids any situation
that might allow someone to claim some injunctive relief of part of the
licence because of it being widely misdescribed.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Endgame for all those SELECT FOR UPDATE changes: fix plan node order
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parsing config files in a directory