Re: Application name patch - v2

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 12:58 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> I think that covers all the suggestions discussed over the last couple
> of days, with the exception of the rejection of \n and similar
> characters which I'm still not entirely convinced is worth the effort.
> Any other opinions on that? Anything else that should be
> added/changed?

So this would effectively allow any minimally authorized user to write
whatever they want into the log file whenever they want?  Doesn't sound
very safe to me.