On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 18:04 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I will add code to make a shutdown checkpoint be a valid starting place
> > for Hot Standby, as long as there are no in-doubt prepared transactions.
> > That way we know there are no xids still running and no locks, without
> > needing to write a record to say so.
>
> Ok, I can live with that, and should be dead simple to implement.
First cut changes made, for discussion.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com