Re: Hot Standby on git
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby on git |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1254474823.17864.326.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby on git (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 11:26 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 10:43 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > >> It seems dangerous to write a WAL record after the shutdown checkpoint. > >> It will be overwritten by subsequent startup, which is a recipe for trouble. > > > > I've said its a corner case and not worth spending time on. I'm putting > > it in at your request. If it's not correct before and not correct after, > > where exactly do you want it? > > I don't know. Perhaps it should go between the REDO pointer of the > shutdown checkpoint and the checkpoint record itself. That would seem minimally invasive approach and would appear to work for both cases. Will do. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: