On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 18:48 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Hmm, yes. ISTM that I'm still calculating latestRunningXid the old way
> > while assuming it is calculated the new way. The new way is just to grab
> > nextXid since we have XidGenLock and do TransactionIdRetreat() on it.
>
> Ok, good, that's what I thought too. I'll fix that.
OK, not working on that, so go ahead. Thanks.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com