On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 22:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It seems like there is some support for what this patch is trying to
> do, but much disagreement about the details of how to get there.
> Where do we go from here?
I think the next step would be to outline what changes would be
necessary in pg_ctl to implement LSB behavior. And then decide case by
case whether it should become the default, an option, or is not
appropriate for pg_ctl.
Kevin apparently sort of agreed to do that when he came back.