Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1253288584.4155.55.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:23 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > >> Is there a reason that you remove the WAL_DEBUG shown below? > > > WAL_DEBUG is not removed by the patch, though that section of code is > > removed, as you observe. I recall an earlier bug report by > > me/conversation on hackers about how that section of code was > > irrecoverably broken, since it's calling an rmgr routine while not in > > recovery and also assuming the data is fully accessible at that point, > > which it is not. > > Wouldn't it be sufficient to remove the rm_desc() call? I agree > that that's broken, but the rest doesn't seem to be. That would make sense also. Previous action just because that was earlier consensus. Will change. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: