Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL

On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing  writes:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 21:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY is a contradiction in terms.  Wishing it were
> >> possible doesn't make it so.
> 
> > It depends on what do you mean by "VACUUM FULL"
> 
> Anything that moves tuples is not acceptable as a hidden background
> operation, 

I did not mean VACUUM FULL to be run as a hidden background operation.
just as something that does not need everything else to be shut down.

> because it will break applications that depend on CTID.

Do you know of any such applications out in the wild ?

> The utility Heikki is talking about is something that DBAs would
> invoke explicitly, presumably with an understanding of the side effects.

Like VACUUM FULL ?

-- 
Hannu Krosing   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability   Services, Consulting and Training