Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Дата
Msg-id 1251955.1605825778@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Список pgsql-hackers
After digging a bit more I noticed that we'd discussed removing
IS OF in the 2007 thread, but forebore because there wasn't an easy
replacement.  pg_typeof() was added a year later (b8fab2411), so we
could have done this at any point since then.

Pushed.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ERROR: too many dynamic shared memory segment
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: new heapcheck contrib module