Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12516.1367630380@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three
Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
> What do you see that I'm missing?
TBH, if I had 20-20 foresight, we'd not be having this discussion:
either I could see that you're right and this patch isn't going to
cause us enormous pain, or I could put my finger on exactly where
and why it's going to hurt us. But I can't do the latter today.
Nonetheless, this patch terrifies me. It's ugly, it's a serious
layering violation, and it flies in the face of very-long-standing
assumptions about the semantics of heap storage. My gut tells me
that we *will* regret shipping things this way. Nor am I impressed
with the amount of functionality we're gaining by taking such a risk.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: