Re: LWLock Queue Jumping
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LWLock Queue Jumping |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1251543722.4839.1496.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | LWLock Queue Jumping (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LWLock Queue Jumping
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:44 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > I'd previously implemented this just by copying and pasting and making > some changes, perhaps not the most desirable way but I thought adding > another parameter to all existing invocations would be a bit > excessive. That's the way I would implement it also, but would call it LWLockAcquireWithPriority() so that it's purpose is clear, rather than refer to its implementation, which may change. > I've tested it fairly thoroughly, Please send the tested patch, if this isn't it. What tests were made? > in the context of using it in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer for acquiring the > WALWriteLock. Apologies if you'd already suggested that recently. I read a few of your posts but not all of them. I don't think WALWriteLock from AdvanceXLInsertBuffer is an important area, but I don't see any harm from it either. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: