On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> SQL is not Lisp. Simple is good. I didn't think Peter was really very
> serious.
Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully
expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other
expressions. So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not
integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me.