Re: Change: l10n patch
От | Marek Černocký |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Change: l10n patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1249309797.27849.83.camel@zabiny обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Change: l10n patch (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page píše v Po 03. 08. 2009 v 12:26 +0100: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Guillaume > Lelarge<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > > > I tried this too, and it works AFAICT. > > > > Not sure why, in some place we use the _ and in other places, we use > > wxGetTranslation. wxGetTranslation isn't passed by argument -k to xgettext in stringextract script. Macro _(s) do automatic cast with macro _T(s) before call wxGetTranslation. So _(s) is useful for constant strings, which should be extracted to POT. And wxGetTranslation is useful for wxString variables (expressions are extracted elsewher, e.g by N_(s) in structure). > > iirc, there is a reason, but I'm darned if I can remember what it it. > Of course, wxGetTranslation won't work well with the stringextract > scripts. > > > Apart from that, the code Marek wrote is looking good. I'll work on the > > ordering in some time. Or perhaps Marek can work on this, if he agrees. I > > don't know enough right know to have a good answer for you. Anyways, there are > > other codes in pgadmin that looks like what Marek wrote, so I think we would > > better apply his patch, and work on the ordering in a separate patch. > > OK - I'll leave this stuff in your capable hands then :-) > > Thanks! > > -- > Dave Page > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com >
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: